Assessing the Lincoln Presence in Europe
Five angles on Lincoln in Europe6This issue of the ASJ consists of thirteen articles addressing five themes. The first section assesses the importance of Lincoln in and to Europe. Richard Cawardine’s and Jay Sexton’s “The Global Lincoln: European Dimensions” and Jared Peatman’s “The Gettysburg Address as Foreign Policy” both address the Lincoln impact factor in European history from broad perspectives. 7The second section takes stock of Lincoln’s place in European culture, especially from the viewpoint of visual culture. Catherine Clinton’s “Statues and Status: Lincoln in Europe” and Caroline Hurley’s “Lincoln in Scotland: A Gift of the Gilded Age” chart the destiny of the most important Lincoln statues in Europe, contextualizing and historicizing their significance in terms of U.S. foreign policy, immigration history, and the legacy of the Civil War. John Dean’s “Abraham Lincoln in European Popular Culture” explores some of the differences between popular representations of Lincoln in American and European culture. Marie Cordié-Levy’s “Matthew Brady’s Lincoln” reflects on the visual messages conveyed to Europe and Europeans by Lincoln’s official photographer. 8The third section addresses how local conditions shaped Lincoln’s European reception. The contribution of Jörg Nagler, “The Lincoln Image in Germany,” scans German history to illustrate the importance of national politics and geostrategic stakes in German representations of America’s 16th president. The chapter by Jacques Portes, “The Hidden Lincoln in French Opinion,” covers similar issues in France while explaining the disappearance of Lincoln from French political discourse shortly after the American Civil War. Olivier Frayssé’s and Laurence Grégoire’s “The French Masonic Tributes to Abraham Lincoln” shows the conflicting influences brought to bear on the formation of Lincoln’s image in the wake of his assassination. Debates over the issue of the “Lincoln Medal of Liberty” point to the strong French attachment to a U.S. democratic model that was to culminate in the donation of the Statue of Liberty by the Grand Orient de France (the main French Masonic organization). 9The fourth section features original research as a testimony to the enduring, if limited, interest of European academics in Lincoln. Olivier Frayssé’s “Abraham Lincoln and the Homespun Spin” proposes a new approach to Lincoln’s leadership qualities, emphasizing the quest for authorship that informed Lincoln’s writings and action. Nathalie Caron’s “Lincoln, Paine and the American Freethought Tradition” explores the vexed question of Lincoln’s religion from a perspective that combines extensive knowledge of the Lincoln and Paine historiographies with the transatlantic history of Freethought. 10The last section contrasts the Lincolns taught in Europe and the United States. U.S. historian Jason Hansen’s “Land of Lincoln: The Teaching of an Historical Icon at the University of Illinois, 2009” explores the challenges of teaching Lincoln in his home state. His recommendation that scholars engage with popular myths has implications that reach far beyond the Illinois state-line. Martina Kohl, Cultural Affairs Specialist with the United States Embassy in Berlin responsible for programs in Germany and Europe, uses her own extensive fieldwork to explore whether Abraham Lincoln should be a school topic 150 years after his death, and in what context he might be taught, in her “Teaching Abraham Lincoln in the EFL Classroom: A German Case Study.”
Exploring the Paradoxes11The insights developed by this collection point to a series of paradoxes. Why does one of the greatest American icons have such a minor place in Europe? This is a particularly intriguing question given the conspicuous presence of American cultural products in Europe, sometimes supported by diplomatic efforts to export American culture for political ends. One can understand the minor place of the Latin American icon Simón Bolívar, given the lack of Venezuelan soft power. But Lincoln? Why does he get less attention than other famous Americans? 12Several of the papers featured in this issue provide richly contextualized answers to these questions, drawing attention to the material, political, cultural conditions under which the figure of Lincoln has been presented to and perceived by Europeans. Thus, we might venture a few general explanations. 13First, some of the challenges faced by Lincoln during his political career were unique to the United States. Outstanding here: developing an economic policy for a nation infused with immigrants and able to populate its largely unused territory at amazing speed; managing the coexistence of four distinct ethnic groups on the same territory (Native American, European, African, Hispanic); and adapting the political system of the Federal Republic to these tasks. 14The choices that Lincoln made or that were made for him shaped U.S. history in his lifetime. These choices also shaped much of the U.S. public discourse since his assassination on Good Friday 1865, creating various and often conflicting narratives that are still omnipresent in U.S. political culture. President Ronald Reagan, for instance, eagerly embraced a quote falsely attributed to Lincoln to justify his neoliberal economic policies: “You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot help the wage-earner by pulling down the wage-payer. You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves” (Schlesinger). Barack Obama declared his candidacy in Springfield to forge a connection between Lincoln and himself. 15The challenges that Lincoln faced did not exist in Europe until much later, and then in a different form. European leaders did not draw on his example or his rhetoric, whether wrongly or rightly attributed. Thus they did not popularize his image. Exceptions exist, notably Willy Brandt’s use of the “house divided” phrase to describe the separation of East and West Germany during the Cold War. But this is such an isolated exception that it seems to prove the rule. While European nations now hesitantly move toward a ‘multicultural’ setting and a half-hearted experiment at a federal union, the United States of the 19th century cannot easily be understood as providing clues for Europe in the 21st century. 16Second, Lincoln is an archetypal American character, richly vernacular, and central to U.S. history and culture. His iconic value is heartwood to the American grain, exportable only to the extent that it resonates with European stereotypes of Americans, for instance the stereotype of the self-made man. 17Finally, diplomatic uses made of Lincoln may have backfired. For instance, George W. Bush’s establishment of “Lincoln corners” in South-East Asia contributed little to the aura of the United States in the region or to a better knowledge of Lincoln. Perhaps the “real Lincoln” has come to stand for policies and developments that critics of the United States reject, in much the way Max Weber turned Benjamin Franklin into an archetype of American capitalism (Weber 137). 18All of this may explain why Lincoln has never been properly evaluated by Europeans, why he has become neither a truly lasting symbol of America in Europe nor a truly universal model. Thus, while the exotic value of Lincoln the rail-splitter and self-made man has remained a low-key element in the European cultural lexicon, only selected parts of the Lincoln legacy have been incorporated into European public discourses at given moments: Lincoln the Emancipator, Lincoln the Commander-in Chief, Lincoln the Keeper of Democracy during a Civil War, Lincoln the Savior of Union, Lincoln the Martyr of a moral cause. But other, later historical figures, both inside and outside the United States, have also incarnated many of these values. The exception here may be Keeper of Democracy during a Civil War, since Russia and Spain have undergone a protracted civil war since Lincoln’s demise. While U.S. troops did fight against the Bolsheviks in 1918–1919, Lincoln’s name was not invoked, and only during the Spanish civil war did the Abraham Lincoln Battalion of the Fifteenth International Brigade, composed of North Americans defending the republic against the fascist rebellion, testify to the endurance of that particular legacy. 19The more we know about Lincoln and his reception worldwide, the more we can answer negatively James G. Randall’s famous question in the 1936 issue of the American Historical Review: “Has the Lincoln theme been exhausted?” (Randall) Our answer is no. With this issue we hope to open new territory.
The History of This Collection20Some of these essays were presented at the Paris conference “European Readings of Abraham Lincoln, His Times & Legacy,” generously hosted October 17–18, 2009 by the American University of Paris (AUP) and beneficently supported by the SUDS research lab at the University of Versailles, the United States Embassy in Paris, the Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, the USA’s Lincoln Bicentennial Commission, the French Network for Early American Studies (REDEHJA), and the Observatoire de la Politique Américaine (OPA/CREW). Thanks for that occasion and ongoing support are also due to Professors Steven Ekovitch of AUP, Jacques Pothier of Université de Versailles, David Blight of Yale University, AUP President Celeste Schenck, President of Université Sorbonne Nouvelle Marie-Christine Lemardeley, Professeur émérite Bernard Vincent, and Professor Richard Carwardine, then of St. Catherine’s College, Oxford, and now president of Corpus Christi College. 21This 2009 event was the first time ever that a conference on the 16th American president had been held in France. A number of well-known European and American scholars participated. We have had to wait until 2016 to publish some of the results of this conference. Some original participants have published their work elsewhere, though we have been fortunate to retain choice gems which have been further developed since then and supplemented with articles commissioned for this issue. 22An especially noteworthy member of the organizing team for “European Readings of Abraham Lincoln” who also conceived of this publication was the Franco-American historian Professor Naomi Wulf of the Université Sorbonne Nouvelle. Her premature death was a great loss for many people and for the world community of Transnational American Studies. It is to Naomi’s memory that we dedicate this collection.
 The real author was an ex- clergyman from Erie, Pa., named William J. H. Boetcker. Having abandoned the pulpit for a more lucrative career as a labor relations adviser for employers, Boetcker in 1916 produced a booklet under the title of Inside Maxims: Gold Nuggets Taken from the Boetcker Lectures.
Randall, James G. “Has the Lincoln Theme Been Exhausted?”American Historical Review 41.2 (1936): 270–94. Print.
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. “Great Hoax of History: Words Lincoln Never Said.” Washington Post. 6 Sept. 1992. Articles.sun-sentinel.com. Web. 14 May 2016.
Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. with Commentary by Stephen Kalberg. Oxford: OUP. 2010. Print.
Olivier Frayssé is Professor of Language, Literature and Civilization of Anglophone countries at Paris Sorbonne University. He has published extensively on U.S. history and culture, notably on Lincoln: Abraham Lincoln, Land and Labor, 1809-1860, transl. Sylvia Neeley, Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1994.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.